According to a Google employee in a recent official product forum thread,
this was a “known issue a while back.” My, what a vague response… vague
enough to lead one to believe that Google doesn’t care too much about
blocking sites from the SERPs for users.
Funny – we’re talking about the same company that has been rolling
out waves of aggressive algo changes for the sake of bettering the “user
experience” for searchers. So, um… why does this not appear to add up?
Seems to me a company so obsessed with pleasing the user would snap to
and fix this problem as soon as people began asking questions.
Maybe more is at play here than meets the eye.
The Hard Evidence
Over at Search Engine Roundtable, Barry Schwartz tried the blocking
feature himself and included screenshots of his findings in his
write-up. Schwartz tried blocking the website”proflowers.com” two
different ways. First, he attempted to use the “block site” feature
directly in the search results, but he noticed it was nowhere to be
found. He then went into his search settings and manually blocked the
site. After waiting a couple of minutes, he searched again.
It was still there.
The site appeared in the ad unit atop the organic results, so I
wondered whether its “sponsored listing” status was the reason the
blocked site still appeared. I decided to try it myself using (what *I*
consider to be) the most annoying website on the planet: eHow.com.
First, I navigated to my personal Google search settings and manually blocked the site:
Notice I blocked the site using both the www and non-www version of
the URL to head off any potential confusion. Then, I waited a few
minutes. When I searched for “how to make ceramic pendants”,this was the
second result:
Confirmed. It really doesn’t work. Try it for yourself.
The Circumstantial Stuff
There’s massive speculation that Google’s been pretty cozy withDemand
Media for quite a long time now. After Ehow’s initial slap when
Google’s Panda algo rolled out, it inexplicably bounced back in the
SERPs – with a vengeance. For that matter,many other content farms are
beginning to resurface in the search results more frequently as well.
Are we to believe that these websites have removed all of their
low-quality content and started from scratch?
Or… is there more to this story?
Forbes, Reuters,
and many other reputable news sources have written glowingly about
DemandMedia’s miraculous resurgence these past few months. As far
asrecord profits go, Demand claims it has reestablished earnings by
diversifying its revenue model. However, it’s hard to ignore the fact
that Demand’s “meh”-worthy Ehow content is also showing back up at the
top of the SERPs.
But let’s flash back to 2011. In April, the Panda update slapped Ehow
from search results right alongside other content farms.Then, in
August, Google renewed its standing advertising agreement with Demand
Media – good for the next three years.Demand Media is big business – the
company boasts ownership of Cracked.com, Ehow, and various social media
websites. Google’s renewed deal with the company was much sweeter than
the originalagreement had been. Here’s some details on the perks of the
new deal, as reported last year by ZDNet:
Of course, Google could not in good faith save Ehow from the initial
wrath of Panda and leave other content farms to plummet into search
engine oblivion simply because it had a big contract with the company.
However, it is rather curious that one year later, we’re once again
seeing Ehow articles on the first page of search results for countless
keyword phrases.
Full disclosure: I was an author for Ehow a couple of years back,
before the site was slapped by the algo changes. Soon after the initial
blow, Demand closed down the article claiming platform for all Ehow
authors, stopped producing content for its Ehow library, and began
weeding out and destroying low-quality articles from its database.
However, a great many articles remained – even those that would be
considered nothing more than”halfway decent” writing. They simply
trimmed the fat by skimming the worst of the worst from their
collection. To this day, mediocre articles remain right alongside the
good stuff.
Use Your Own Judgment
The opinions in this article are purely speculation, so take the
information herein with a big grain of salt. Suggesting that Google
somehow restored Ehow’s standing due to backroom deals would be akin to
insider trading… or would it?
This is uncharted territory, and the rules of the Internet arebeing
written in real-time. Things that seem unfair may be happening right
under our noses, and until we set precedents and define the legality of
certain situations (as we’ve seen the FTC attempt to do multiple times
this year), the search landscape is a virtual free-for-all.
Why do you think Google’s no longer blocking websites from itssearch
results? Do you think it’s a glitch, or is there more atplay here? Give
us your take in the comments below!
Nell Terry, Post from sitepronews.com
Google Not Blocking Sites – Deliberate or Oversight?